Sentido Comun: Every weekday AMLO has a morning press conference, a mañanera. How do these differ from the press conferences he gave as the mayor of México City from 2000 to 2005?
As mayor, AMLO governed as more a traditional politician. But as the presidential candidate of a new party, he made himself into a political figure outside of the old system. Since becoming president in 2018, his style has become more popular, direct, and clear.
After 2018, for the first time, AMLO began using humor, and doing something that was formerly unthinkable for a tough politician. He began to humanize himself. He speaks personally, in his own voice and style.
Yes, AMLO has the help of a group of colleagues, but unlike other politicians, coached on how to smile and what to say and when, he breaks with those traditional forms of political marketing and creates a new form of political communication.
AMLO presents a new reality. He gives the historical background. He presents his projects, his alternatives. I invite you, the people, to join us, he says. The mañaneras have become more than an axis of communication. They have become the axis of government, in the sense that the people are learning what decisions are being made and why and how projects are progressing. They’re experiencing the substance of political debate.
For the first time, the people have a flesh-and-blood representative, no longer just an abstraction making speeche in a vacuum. AMLO is speaking to the people. The mañanera is not for the journalists, not for the media, not even for the politicians. In the communication process, the people see their president as the political subject — and take him seriously. This constant communication has increased his power.
AMLO talks a lot about history, doesn’t he, not just current affairs?
AMLO has the ability to tell the history of México from his perspective, with humor, culture, and music. This opens up people’s minds to stories that had been buried by previous administrations. Let's remember that neoliberalism closed memory, closed history, and, in so doing, closed the nation's independence project.
Back in 2010, under a neoliberal government, the political debate revolved around how we integrate into the United States. We had lost the Bolivarian dream of an independent, united Latin America. The market, they told us, amounted to our only choice. To integrate with the United States, we had to erase our historical memory.
AMLO is helping us recover our memory and history. The politician has become the teacher. He shares his historical knowledge, his political reading of history, to help us reflect on and understand the present. He is presenting us with a rare opportunity. From academia, we mostly get historical anecdotes, questions that don’t orient us politically — for example, did Pancho Villa escape dressed as a woman or not, or is that story just an urban myth?