That’s a Western and elitist view. We’ve always had art by and for the people. México, unlike Europe, has had a long history of indigenous art, much of it —pottery and weaving, for example — designed for daily use.
México also has a long tradition of murals and printmaking. The Taller produced posters in the 1930s to help President Cárdenas promote his social programs. During the same period, artists in the US were similarly hired to promote FDR’s New Deal, and Mexican and US artists collaborated during those years.
Did US artists continue to work at the Taller after the Great Depression?
The African American sculptor and graphic artist Elizabeth Catlett and her then-husband, the printmaker Charles White, went to Mexico in 1946 to study the murals and graphic art produced after the Mexican Revolution. She stayed at the Taller for 20 years. Another more contemporary example: Rini Templeton, who moved to México and joined the Taller in 1974. We’ve all seen and maybe used her distinctive prints. She let everyone use her art for free. She didn’t want to “own” art. She made it to be useful to people in struggle.
Like father like daughter, you’re both a visual artist and a political activist. Do your own paintings serve a political purpose?
I’ve thought about that all my life. As I grew older, I looked for more nuanced and long-term political messages, ones that lasted past single issues. Now I paint people in social situations, some political, some not, but always with an eye for what makes people tick, and especially what “ordinary” people are thinking, feeling, and doing.
I paint women working in non-traditional occupations, especially the building trades and construction. Women had to fight to get those jobs and had to support each other to survive harassment on the job from male co-workers. My paintings celebrate and normalize their experience.