In addition, México under Andrés Manuel López Obrador — who is more pro-labor than past Mexican presidents — may provide us the opportunity to test the agreement’s pro-labor terms, to help us assess whether trade policy and trade agreements can be an effective tool to further a model of economic globalization that gives most people the opportunity to live a decent life. The current model has primarily benefited transnational capital.
But what do you say to those in the US labor left who feel that the new labor provisions amount to no more than window dressing?´
The revised NAFTA’s labor terms no longer sit in a side agreement, as they did in the original 1993 deal. They sit in the core text of the agreement, subject to a special labor enforcement system that allows cases to be brought directly against specific companies, with penalties imposed on firms found in violation. The test will be in the implementation.
Do you see other positive changes?
The elimination of the old Investor-State Dispute Settlement rules rates as a significant change. This old system empowered multinational corporations and wealthy individuals to put the “right” to private profit ahead of the right of nations to protect the interests of their people. Under this system, multinationals and the rich could challenge policies enacted by the governments of NAFTA’s signatory countries. Their subsequent frivolous claims made all three nations want to get rid of NAFTA’s dispute settlement rules.
But many of the old problems with NAFTA do remain in the new agreement. And we also see some new issues of concern.